1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
+1 for that. |
4 |
|
5 |
I think it would be too confusing if we add another overlay. |
6 |
Why not put TDE (are we calling it TDE now?) ~ or mask it via package.mask |
7 |
until we have a working (possibly not bug-free) version? |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 10:07:52 Ladislav Laska wrote: |
11 |
> Yes, that's what I was thinking. I'm also thinking we could make all |
12 |
> "original" ebuilds stable and TDE releases sort out by ~, at least for |
13 |
> now. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Regards Ladislav Laska |
17 |
> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
18 |
> --- |
19 |
> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
20 |
> |
21 |
> 2010/9/20 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" <xificurk@×××××.com>: |
22 |
> > Personally, I don't see much point in creating a new overlay since it |
23 |
> > would be most probably used by the same users as kde-sunset. We can |
24 |
> > still keep old ebuilds of latest official KDE3 packages there and in the |
25 |
> > same time add "new" releases of TDE. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > Petr |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Ladislav Laska napsal(a): |
30 |
> >> Hello, |
31 |
> >> |
32 |
> >> I'd like to ask, what do you think of trinity project? The 3.5.12 |
33 |
> >> release is relatively near and I'd like to start discussion wether to |
34 |
> >> incorporate it into sunset, or develop it in separate overlay. |
35 |
> >> |
36 |
> >> I originally intended to do it in sunset, but now I'm not sure. The |
37 |
> >> development seems to be pretty serious and maybe it won't be sunset |
38 |
> >> anymore - I'd say we should create something like kde-resurrection. |
39 |
> >> |
40 |
> >> :-) |
41 |
> >> |
42 |
> >> What do you think? |
43 |
> >> |
44 |
> >> Regards Ladislav Laska |
45 |
> >> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
46 |
> >> --- |
47 |
> >> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
greetings, |
52 |
Roman |
53 |
-- |
54 |
And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy |
55 |
on us. |
56 |
-- Luke 17:13 |