1 |
What's up with kde-4.3.2? I see it's masked, but the mask was pre-4.3.2 |
2 |
release I believe, presumably until 4.3.2 was released, it has been out |
3 |
for several days now, and the masking comment isn't helpful at all as to |
4 |
why it might /still/ be masked, even in the kde-testing overlay. |
5 |
|
6 |
Also, I see revision bumps for 4.3.1 when I'd expect to see 4.3.2 coming |
7 |
out, and the lzma USE flag that was on testing kdelibs now seems to be |
8 |
disappeared again as it downgrades back to gentoo-tree, etc. |
9 |
|
10 |
So I'm asking what's up. |
11 |
|
12 |
Meanwhile, what about kde-testing changelogs? When I see a -rX bump, I |
13 |
like to see why it's happening. Similarly with USE flags coming and |
14 |
going. kde-testing doesn't seem to include changelogs. OK, sort of, but |
15 |
is there an easy replacement for it, besides manually browsing viewcvs or |
16 |
whatever? It's git-based, right? I know and use git what-changed on my |
17 |
live kernel git all the time. I suppose I could do that on the kde- |
18 |
testing git repo as well. Is that the suggested solution or is there |
19 |
better? I've been more or less flying blind and it's beginning to bother |
20 |
me, so getting the problem addressed would make me a rather happier |
21 |
camper. =:^) |
22 |
|
23 |
And if I do find a bug, do I check for and post it @ bugs.gentoo, or |
24 |
elsewhere? |
25 |
|
26 |
Meanwhile, there's not a mailing list to follow what's going on more |
27 |
closely, is there? I obviously already follow this one. I suppose it's |
28 |
mostly IRC driven... and I'm not an IRC type of guy. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
32 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
33 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |