| 1 |
Feel free to do so, it will usually be matter of rewriting 1 to 2, but |
| 2 |
you need to check for some nonstandard behavior, which could be |
| 3 |
broken. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yes, it does make sense. I've commited patch to do so. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'll probably try to rebuild my kde too, in order to check for similar issues. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Regards Ladislav Laska |
| 10 |
S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
| 11 |
--- |
| 12 |
xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Chris Bandy <cbandy@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 17 |
> Ladislav Laska wrote: |
| 18 |
>> Sure we can, in fact, it was like this until recently. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> Well, I've grepped ebuilds and found 43 with EAPI=0/1 and more with no |
| 21 |
>> EAPI set. That's a lot of packages and since I don't have time to fix |
| 22 |
>> all of them, I'll commit workaround. Feel free to remove it when all |
| 23 |
>> packages are fixed. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> Regards Ladislav Laska |
| 26 |
>> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
| 27 |
>> --- |
| 28 |
>> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Thank you very much. If porting from EAPI=1 to 2 is as simple as your |
| 32 |
> commit for my two packages, I'd be happy to test some others and submit |
| 33 |
> patches. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Does it make sense to emit a QA/warning when you find PATCHES in EAPI=0|1 ? |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> -- Chris |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
Archives