1 |
Chris Barker wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I'm having some issues with tetex. Are any of you using it without |
6 |
> problems? |
7 |
|
8 |
No problems here; I have tetex-2.0.2-r3 installed from portage. |
9 |
|
10 |
> |
11 |
> Two issues I've identified are: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> 1)Problems with the time package, which used postscript times fonts. The |
14 |
> ligatures (fi, etc) are getting displayed wrong in xdvi. |
15 |
|
16 |
Sounds like a problem with xdvi. Try kdvi (part of kdegraphics, I believe). |
17 |
|
18 |
> |
19 |
> 2) pdflatex seems to have trouble finding fonts, in particular: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Warning: pdflatex (file phvr8r): Font phvr8r at 720 not found |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I do have: |
24 |
> /var/cache/fonts/pk/modeless/adobe/times/ptmr8r.600pk |
25 |
> /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/adobe/times/ptmr8rn.tfm |
26 |
> /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/adobe/times/ptmr8r.tfm |
27 |
> |
28 |
> shouldn't the 720dpi one get generated automatically? Besides, I don't |
29 |
> want bit mapped fonts in a pdf anyway. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> 3) related to previous: pdflatex seems to be putting bit mapped fonts |
32 |
> into the pdf rather than scalable fonts. |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
AFAICT, pdflatex gives me scalable fonts. |
36 |
|
37 |
> The strange thing is that I've discovered these issues on a document |
38 |
> that was working just great with the tetex that came with Redhat7.2, |
39 |
> which was pretty old! |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Anyone have any ideas? Maybe I should just install tetex by hand from |
42 |
> source instead. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> -Chris |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list |