| 1 |
Maciej Mrozowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi there! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Resulting from discussion during last Gentoo KDE team meeting taking place 22 |
| 5 |
> Oct 2009 at #gentoo-meetings (summary fill be available soon), having Gentoo |
| 6 |
> GNOME team representative, it's been decided to go ahead with splitting |
| 7 |
> desktop profile to DE-specific subprofiles, to avoid bloat and provide desktop |
| 8 |
> specific separation which should result in desktop subprofiles being actually |
| 9 |
> practical. |
| 10 |
> It's been proposed to: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> - keep 'desktop' profile but strip it from any desktop specific features and |
| 13 |
> settings, making it default recommended choice for anyone using non-KDE and |
| 14 |
> non-GNOME desktop environment, yet avoiding USE flags bloat. Any other DE is |
| 15 |
> free to join and create own DE-specific subprofile if needed. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> - create 'KDE' (or 'kde') and 'GNOME' (or 'gnome') subprofiles within |
| 18 |
> 'desktop' profile and move any desktop specific things there. This should in |
| 19 |
> theory allow us to not add 'recommended' IUSE defaults to desktop specific |
| 20 |
> packages, but keep those settings in profile - making profile effectively 'out |
| 21 |
> of the box' solution for those who need it. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> If you have any comments, suggestions, important notices regarding this |
| 24 |
> change, please keep discussion in gentoo-desktop mailing list. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Thanks |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I personally like this idea. At one time I used a bare profile and a |
| 31 |
huge USE line to keep unneeded things out. This would be a really nice |
| 32 |
solution. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
You got my vote on this one. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
:-) :-) |
Archives