1 |
As you may have noticed, there is another thread and some of current |
2 |
developers have suggested new overlay. |
3 |
|
4 |
I personally am not really decided what would be best. Addint it to |
5 |
current overlay does have its benefits - easy update and so on. But |
6 |
having overlay just for trinity gives better options for new users - |
7 |
they could install clean trinity, without third-party stuff (well, at |
8 |
least without unmaintained stuff). I'd imagine there are many tools |
9 |
noone uses. |
10 |
|
11 |
Well, I'd go for an overlay, but since we don't have a leader (don't |
12 |
we?) or some position like that, I feel like I shouldn't make an |
13 |
decision myself, so should we take a vote or something? :-) |
14 |
|
15 |
Regards Ladislav Laska |
16 |
S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
17 |
--- |
18 |
xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Ladislav Laska |
23 |
<ladislav.laska@×××××.com> wrote: |
24 |
> It should definitely be hardmasked until it's complete. When the time |
25 |
> comes and trinity will be ready, we shall unmask it and let users |
26 |
> upgrade. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Anyone who wishes not to, could easily mask it back, since all trinity |
29 |
> ebuilds will be clearly higher version. We should also create a list |
30 |
> in documentation for this purpose (don't want to push users to |
31 |
> upgrade, since some of them are using 3.5.10 and may not want a |
32 |
> change). |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Regards Ladislav Laska |
35 |
> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
36 |
> --- |
37 |
> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Roman <lists@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
42 |
>> Hi, |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> +1 for that. |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> I think it would be too confusing if we add another overlay. |
47 |
>> Why not put TDE (are we calling it TDE now?) ~ or mask it via package.mask |
48 |
>> until we have a working (possibly not bug-free) version? |
49 |
>> |
50 |
>> |
51 |
>> On Tuesday 21 September 2010 10:07:52 Ladislav Laska wrote: |
52 |
>>> Yes, that's what I was thinking. I'm also thinking we could make all |
53 |
>>> "original" ebuilds stable and TDE releases sort out by ~, at least for |
54 |
>>> now. |
55 |
>>> |
56 |
>>> |
57 |
>>> Regards Ladislav Laska |
58 |
>>> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
59 |
>>> --- |
60 |
>>> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
61 |
>>> |
62 |
>>> 2010/9/20 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" <xificurk@×××××.com>: |
63 |
>>> > Personally, I don't see much point in creating a new overlay since it |
64 |
>>> > would be most probably used by the same users as kde-sunset. We can |
65 |
>>> > still keep old ebuilds of latest official KDE3 packages there and in the |
66 |
>>> > same time add "new" releases of TDE. |
67 |
>>> > |
68 |
>>> > Petr |
69 |
>>> > |
70 |
>>> > Ladislav Laska napsal(a): |
71 |
>>> >> Hello, |
72 |
>>> >> |
73 |
>>> >> I'd like to ask, what do you think of trinity project? The 3.5.12 |
74 |
>>> >> release is relatively near and I'd like to start discussion wether to |
75 |
>>> >> incorporate it into sunset, or develop it in separate overlay. |
76 |
>>> >> |
77 |
>>> >> I originally intended to do it in sunset, but now I'm not sure. The |
78 |
>>> >> development seems to be pretty serious and maybe it won't be sunset |
79 |
>>> >> anymore - I'd say we should create something like kde-resurrection. |
80 |
>>> >> |
81 |
>>> >> :-) |
82 |
>>> >> |
83 |
>>> >> What do you think? |
84 |
>>> >> |
85 |
>>> >> Regards Ladislav Laska |
86 |
>>> >> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
87 |
>>> >> --- |
88 |
>>> >> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
89 |
>> |
90 |
>> |
91 |
>> |
92 |
>> greetings, |
93 |
>> Roman |
94 |
>> -- |
95 |
>> And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy |
96 |
>> on us. |
97 |
>> -- Luke 17:13 |
98 |
>> |
99 |
>> |
100 |
> |