1 |
Hello, |
2 |
|
3 |
I have to agree, clean overlay would be better. |
4 |
|
5 |
It would be really bad idea to apply patches to trinity, when we can |
6 |
push them into trinity (if they're general enough). Anyway, many |
7 |
things have changes, so I suppose they will be mostly outdated. |
8 |
|
9 |
Regards Ladislav Laska |
10 |
S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
11 |
--- |
12 |
xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Roman <lists@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
17 |
> Hi! |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Since i haven't seen any reply since the 21st and 3.5.12 about to be released |
20 |
> today, i'd say let's take a vote! |
21 |
> |
22 |
> After reading the arguments, i have to rechoice and feel a new clean + frsh |
23 |
> overlay could be be beneficial. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Also i think it would be good idea to start with clean ebuilds, without any |
26 |
> (gentoo-sepcific) patches, if they are not needed for a working copy of |
27 |
> trinity. This can be added later on.. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> On Tuesday 21 September 2010 14:08:01 Ladislav Laska wrote: |
30 |
>> As you may have noticed, there is another thread and some of current |
31 |
>> developers have suggested new overlay. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> I personally am not really decided what would be best. Addint it to |
34 |
>> current overlay does have its benefits - easy update and so on. But |
35 |
>> having overlay just for trinity gives better options for new users - |
36 |
>> they could install clean trinity, without third-party stuff (well, at |
37 |
>> least without unmaintained stuff). I'd imagine there are many tools |
38 |
>> noone uses. |
39 |
>> |
40 |
>> Well, I'd go for an overlay, but since we don't have a leader (don't |
41 |
>> we?) or some position like that, I feel like I shouldn't make an |
42 |
>> decision myself, so should we take a vote or something? :-) |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> Regards Ladislav Laska |
45 |
>> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
46 |
>> --- |
47 |
>> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
48 |
>> |
49 |
>> |
50 |
>> |
51 |
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Ladislav Laska |
52 |
>> |
53 |
>> <ladislav.laska@×××××.com> wrote: |
54 |
>> > It should definitely be hardmasked until it's complete. When the time |
55 |
>> > comes and trinity will be ready, we shall unmask it and let users |
56 |
>> > upgrade. |
57 |
>> > |
58 |
>> > Anyone who wishes not to, could easily mask it back, since all trinity |
59 |
>> > ebuilds will be clearly higher version. We should also create a list |
60 |
>> > in documentation for this purpose (don't want to push users to |
61 |
>> > upgrade, since some of them are using 3.5.10 and may not want a |
62 |
>> > change). |
63 |
>> > |
64 |
>> > Regards Ladislav Laska |
65 |
>> > S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
66 |
>> > --- |
67 |
>> > xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
68 |
>> > |
69 |
>> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Roman <lists@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
70 |
>> >> Hi, |
71 |
>> >> |
72 |
>> >> +1 for that. |
73 |
>> >> |
74 |
>> >> I think it would be too confusing if we add another overlay. |
75 |
>> >> Why not put TDE (are we calling it TDE now?) ~ or mask it via |
76 |
>> >> package.mask until we have a working (possibly not bug-free) version? |
77 |
>> >> |
78 |
>> >> On Tuesday 21 September 2010 10:07:52 Ladislav Laska wrote: |
79 |
>> >>> Yes, that's what I was thinking. I'm also thinking we could make all |
80 |
>> >>> "original" ebuilds stable and TDE releases sort out by ~, at least for |
81 |
>> >>> now. |
82 |
>> >>> |
83 |
>> >>> |
84 |
>> >>> Regards Ladislav Laska |
85 |
>> >>> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
86 |
>> >>> --- |
87 |
>> >>> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
88 |
>> >>> |
89 |
>> >>> 2010/9/20 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" <xificurk@×××××.com>: |
90 |
>> >>> > Personally, I don't see much point in creating a new overlay since it |
91 |
>> >>> > would be most probably used by the same users as kde-sunset. We can |
92 |
>> >>> > still keep old ebuilds of latest official KDE3 packages there and in |
93 |
>> >>> > the same time add "new" releases of TDE. |
94 |
>> >>> > |
95 |
>> >>> > Petr |
96 |
>> >>> > |
97 |
>> >>> > Ladislav Laska napsal(a): |
98 |
>> >>> >> Hello, |
99 |
>> >>> >> |
100 |
>> >>> >> I'd like to ask, what do you think of trinity project? The 3.5.12 |
101 |
>> >>> >> release is relatively near and I'd like to start discussion wether |
102 |
>> >>> >> to incorporate it into sunset, or develop it in separate overlay. |
103 |
>> >>> >> |
104 |
>> >>> >> I originally intended to do it in sunset, but now I'm not sure. The |
105 |
>> >>> >> development seems to be pretty serious and maybe it won't be sunset |
106 |
>> >>> >> anymore - I'd say we should create something like kde-resurrection. |
107 |
>> >>> >> |
108 |
>> >>> >> :-) |
109 |
>> >>> >> |
110 |
>> >>> >> What do you think? |
111 |
>> >>> >> |
112 |
>> >>> >> Regards Ladislav Laska |
113 |
>> >>> >> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
114 |
>> >>> >> --- |
115 |
>> >>> >> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
116 |
>> >> |
117 |
>> >> greetings, |
118 |
>> >> Roman |
119 |
>> >> -- |
120 |
>> >> And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy |
121 |
>> >> on us. |
122 |
>> >> -- Luke 17:13 |
123 |
> |
124 |
> |
125 |
> |
126 |
> greetings, |
127 |
> Roman |
128 |
> -- |
129 |
> The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. |
130 |
> -- Merrick Furst |
131 |
> |
132 |
> |