Gentoo Archives: gentoo-desktop

From: Roman Zilka <zilka@×××××××.cz>
To: gentoo-desktop@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop] Vulnerabilities on an RFC-1918 masqueraded Linux box.
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:31:43
Message-Id: 20110324193017.13c9cb20.zilka@fi.muni.cz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-desktop] Vulnerabilities on an RFC-1918 masqueraded Linux box. by Lindsay Haisley
1 > > I suggest quitting this discussion. It's getting way
2 > > off-topic, too general and unfit for this mailinglist, as all these
3 > > questions can be answered by checking sources someone else has
4 > > previously spent their time on writing.
5 >
6 > Roman, are you a moderator on this list? The Gentoo website describes
7 > it as a "Mailing list devoted to Gentoo on the desktop" so I assumed
8 > that Gentoo desktop security was an appropriate topic.
9 >
10 > That having been said, perhaps you might recommend a few of the best
11 > "sources someone else has previously spent their time on writing" since
12 > you seem to have knowledge of these, and I'll be happy to let the thread
13 > drop.
14
15 This is exactly what this mailinglist primarily isn't for: re-relling
16 stories Google can tell better, answering questions Google can answer. I
17 say "primarily" - an off-topic off-shot here and there can't harm
18 anyone, but we've had some already. If the list didn't have this policy
19 and if it didn't more or less stick to it, it would have become a chat
20 room for anyone who just doesn't want to take the time to search for
21 themselves and instead opts for the lazier choice: just ask others,
22 it's easier. I know it because I've been monitoring this list for years
23 (read-only, for the most part). As you say: the list is for Gentoo on
24 desktops. Not for general Linux security discussion. True, Gentoo is
25 Linux, but we're here for Gentoo specifically. Otherwise we could just
26 call the list "the list on everything" because, for example, Gentoo
27 runs on CPUs and CPUs are in desktops, so random chat about CPU-related
28 stuff is related to Gentoo on desktops. The same for any piece of
29 hardware, and more than that. You get the idea.
30
31 You boldly state that you'll be happy to drop this thread if certain
32 conditions of yours are met. It sounds like you believe only you decide
33 whether the thread is dropped or not and when. Well, it's not true. To
34 my eyes this thread has become teaching certain basics in electronic
35 communication and using the Internet. Everyone has the right to not
36 know them, but I just don't feel like this is the right place to
37 explain them. So I'm ending my participation in this particular thread
38 and if everyone else does the same, the thread ends here, whether you
39 decide so or not. Unless you'd go on talking to yourself, in which case
40 it would probably end a bit later by the power of a moderator.
41
42 -rz

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-desktop] Vulnerabilities on an RFC-1918 masqueraded Linux box. Lindsay Haisley <fmouse-gentoo@×××.com>