Gentoo Archives: gentoo-desktop

From: Justin Denick <justin.denick@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-desktop@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: Openssh really needed in desktop profiles?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:36:23
Message-Id: 81e08d920702260432pa07a101i16e251bd9c634aaa@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-desktop] Re: Openssh really needed in desktop profiles? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 2/26/07, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 >
3 > Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> posted
4 > 1172456062.8807.11.camel@××××××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Sun,
5 > 25 Feb 2007 21:14:22 -0500:
6 >
7 > Doncan inquired...
8 >
9 > >> Why is openssh (as virtual/ssh) part of the desktop profiles?
10 > >
11 > > Uhh... Because I like it and people expect it to be there. You're more
12 > > than capable of removing it from your system.
13 > >
14 > >> Anyway, I think at least a discussion might be worthwhile, and I
15 > >> decided to bring it up here to see what desktop folks thought, before
16 > >> bothering the entire dev list with the idea. If it gets shot down
17 > >> here, then no need to bring it up there. I keep thinking that
18 > >> /someone/ must have asked the question before, but I haven't seen it in
19 > >> three years now, so it can't be /too/ much of a FAQ.
20 > >
21 > > Feel free to bring it up, but the desktop profile is maintained by
22 > > Release Engineering since it is used to build release media. I have no
23 > > intentions on removing it, since I see it as invaluable, but if a
24 > > convincing enough argument were made, I could see *some* concessions on
25 > > it. My personal belief is that the profiles shouldn't be removing
26 > > requirements on things unless they're incompatible.
27 >
28 > Well, my only argument is the accepted wisdom that any app left installed
29 > but unused on a system, particularly if it's a net app, is a security
30 > vulnerability only waiting a most inconvenient time to show itself.
31 >
32 > As I said, for some reason package.provided simply isn't working for ssh
33 > ATM, for whatever reason. However, it's brought in by virtual/ssh, and
34 > by creating an /etc/portage/profiles/virtuals and pointing virutal/ssh at
35 > something convenient, in this case baselayout, I cured the problem a
36 > different way. =8^)
37 >
38 > Having safely hidden the system-dep-that-isn't-a-dep once again, it's not
39 > a big enough deal to find the motivation to be all that convincing if the
40 > above argument doesn't do it, so well enough left alone... until the next
41 > time it wants to merge for whatever reason. =8^)
42
43
44 I don't believe that the service is turned on by default, even if it is
45 installed by default. You must do rc-update add sshd default before it
46 become as security vulnerability. And if you've ever used fish:// you'd know
47 just how useful ssh can be in a desktop profile.
48
49 --
50 > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
51 > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
52 > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
53 >
54 > --
55 > gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list
56 >
57 >
58
59
60 --
61 In vino veritas.
62 [In wine there is truth.]
63 -- Pliny