Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas Kirchner <lists@××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-desktop@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-desktop] Re: Re: Udev rules and kernel device names | ||
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:33:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20041022203407.GA17571@rochester.rr.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: Udev rules and kernel device names by Lindsay Haisley |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 03:18:52PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote: |
| 2 | > Well this does seem to introduce a rather obvious chicken <-> egg problem. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | It does, if you don't know what the standard /dev name is. Obviously udev is creating the devices, so they're not there for the kernel to give a /dev name to yet. All I meant was that if you know the standard /dev name the kernel gives, try that. |
| 5 | If it's something new that's not recognized, I admit it wasn't the most useful advice. :P |
| 6 | Tom |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: Re: Udev rules and kernel device names | Lindsay Haisley <fmouse-gentoo@×××.com> |