1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
Since i haven't seen any reply since the 21st and 3.5.12 about to be released |
4 |
today, i'd say let's take a vote! |
5 |
|
6 |
After reading the arguments, i have to rechoice and feel a new clean + frsh |
7 |
overlay could be be beneficial. |
8 |
|
9 |
Also i think it would be good idea to start with clean ebuilds, without any |
10 |
(gentoo-sepcific) patches, if they are not needed for a working copy of |
11 |
trinity. This can be added later on.. |
12 |
|
13 |
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 14:08:01 Ladislav Laska wrote: |
14 |
> As you may have noticed, there is another thread and some of current |
15 |
> developers have suggested new overlay. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I personally am not really decided what would be best. Addint it to |
18 |
> current overlay does have its benefits - easy update and so on. But |
19 |
> having overlay just for trinity gives better options for new users - |
20 |
> they could install clean trinity, without third-party stuff (well, at |
21 |
> least without unmaintained stuff). I'd imagine there are many tools |
22 |
> noone uses. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Well, I'd go for an overlay, but since we don't have a leader (don't |
25 |
> we?) or some position like that, I feel like I shouldn't make an |
26 |
> decision myself, so should we take a vote or something? :-) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Regards Ladislav Laska |
29 |
> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
30 |
> --- |
31 |
> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Ladislav Laska |
36 |
> |
37 |
> <ladislav.laska@×××××.com> wrote: |
38 |
> > It should definitely be hardmasked until it's complete. When the time |
39 |
> > comes and trinity will be ready, we shall unmask it and let users |
40 |
> > upgrade. |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > Anyone who wishes not to, could easily mask it back, since all trinity |
43 |
> > ebuilds will be clearly higher version. We should also create a list |
44 |
> > in documentation for this purpose (don't want to push users to |
45 |
> > upgrade, since some of them are using 3.5.10 and may not want a |
46 |
> > change). |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> > Regards Ladislav Laska |
49 |
> > S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
50 |
> > --- |
51 |
> > xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Roman <lists@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
54 |
> >> Hi, |
55 |
> >> |
56 |
> >> +1 for that. |
57 |
> >> |
58 |
> >> I think it would be too confusing if we add another overlay. |
59 |
> >> Why not put TDE (are we calling it TDE now?) ~ or mask it via |
60 |
> >> package.mask until we have a working (possibly not bug-free) version? |
61 |
> >> |
62 |
> >> On Tuesday 21 September 2010 10:07:52 Ladislav Laska wrote: |
63 |
> >>> Yes, that's what I was thinking. I'm also thinking we could make all |
64 |
> >>> "original" ebuilds stable and TDE releases sort out by ~, at least for |
65 |
> >>> now. |
66 |
> >>> |
67 |
> >>> |
68 |
> >>> Regards Ladislav Laska |
69 |
> >>> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
70 |
> >>> --- |
71 |
> >>> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
72 |
> >>> |
73 |
> >>> 2010/9/20 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" <xificurk@×××××.com>: |
74 |
> >>> > Personally, I don't see much point in creating a new overlay since it |
75 |
> >>> > would be most probably used by the same users as kde-sunset. We can |
76 |
> >>> > still keep old ebuilds of latest official KDE3 packages there and in |
77 |
> >>> > the same time add "new" releases of TDE. |
78 |
> >>> > |
79 |
> >>> > Petr |
80 |
> >>> > |
81 |
> >>> > Ladislav Laska napsal(a): |
82 |
> >>> >> Hello, |
83 |
> >>> >> |
84 |
> >>> >> I'd like to ask, what do you think of trinity project? The 3.5.12 |
85 |
> >>> >> release is relatively near and I'd like to start discussion wether |
86 |
> >>> >> to incorporate it into sunset, or develop it in separate overlay. |
87 |
> >>> >> |
88 |
> >>> >> I originally intended to do it in sunset, but now I'm not sure. The |
89 |
> >>> >> development seems to be pretty serious and maybe it won't be sunset |
90 |
> >>> >> anymore - I'd say we should create something like kde-resurrection. |
91 |
> >>> >> |
92 |
> >>> >> :-) |
93 |
> >>> >> |
94 |
> >>> >> What do you think? |
95 |
> >>> >> |
96 |
> >>> >> Regards Ladislav Laska |
97 |
> >>> >> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
98 |
> >>> >> --- |
99 |
> >>> >> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
100 |
> >> |
101 |
> >> greetings, |
102 |
> >> Roman |
103 |
> >> -- |
104 |
> >> And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy |
105 |
> >> on us. |
106 |
> >> -- Luke 17:13 |
107 |
|
108 |
|
109 |
|
110 |
greetings, |
111 |
Roman |
112 |
-- |
113 |
The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. |
114 |
-- Merrick Furst |