| 1 |
Lindsay Haisley wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Thus spake Stuart Stegall on Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:19:47AM CDT |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>The real problem is that all of the rippers on linux are complete crap |
| 7 |
>>compared to the rips with EAC or PlexTools. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>Has anyone gotten really serious about developing a professional quality |
| 12 |
>studio suite for Linux, e.g. Protools or any of the other pacakges that run |
| 13 |
>on the Mac, or even on Windows, for professional studio work? Even if it |
| 14 |
>were commercial software, it would be a big step forward for Linux. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>Most of the bleeding edge Linux audio processing software I see is developed |
| 17 |
>by and for geeks, is fairly obvioiusly still in the development phase, and |
| 18 |
>often has been there for years ;-) Mixers (including most mixer UIs in ALSA |
| 19 |
>that I've seen) are not user friendly. Other stuff is buggy, noisy, |
| 20 |
>unstable, or unusable for some other reason, often because the UI is so |
| 21 |
>completely at odds with what a studio engineer would expect and be able to |
| 22 |
>grok without taking a crash course in under-the-hood Linux. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
I've found this. |
| 27 |
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7342 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
and this: |
| 30 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=17812&highlight=audio+tools |
| 31 |
<http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=17812&highlight=audio+tools> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
that's about all the help I can give, I'm not a musician. |
Archives