1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 12:46 +0100, Tim Weber wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>On Tuesday 16 November 2004 18:21, Chris Barker wrote: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>>By the way, it might be a good idea to put a comment in the standard |
10 |
>>>fstab to indicate that those need to be replaced with the appropriate |
11 |
>>>entries. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>Please file a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> |
18 |
>A better solution is (as always, in my opinion with system-affecting |
19 |
>files such as this) to instead provide a fstab.example, or not to |
20 |
>provide an fstab via portage, at all. |
21 |
> |
22 |
>After all, one has to create the fstab during install anyway, so why |
23 |
>provide a "template" that can easily break a person's system if they |
24 |
>aren't careful? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
I second that -- a well commented fstab.example that wouldn't overwrite |
29 |
your fstab would be excellent. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list |