1 |
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:05 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 26 February 2007, mail <lists@×××××.net> wrote about 'Re: |
3 |
> [gentoo-desktop] Trying to install gnucash - g-wrap failure': |
4 |
> > On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 04:47 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
5 |
> > > On Friday 23 February 2007 16:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
6 |
> > > > On Friday 23 February 2007, mail <lists@×××××.net> wrote about 'Re: |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > > [gentoo-desktop] Trying to install gnucash - g-wrap failure': |
9 |
> > > > > Thanks, |
10 |
> > > > > but none of the masking or keywords work. It seems that |
11 |
> > > > > gnucash is dead. |
12 |
> > > > > I wonder why it is in portage at all? |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > Nope. app-office/gnucash is not dead: |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > I had to install the following packages to get gnucash working: |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > glib is 2.5 installed so I don't know why gnucash needs a broken 1.2? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Because those two versions are anywhere near source or binary compatible. |
21 |
> Glib changed significantly between 1.x and 2.x, so that programs written |
22 |
> against 1.x have to be non-trivially ported to 2.x. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I'm also not sure if there is any way to support 1.x and 2.x of glib from |
25 |
> the same codebase. If not, that would make migration doubly difficult. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> > I |
28 |
> > tried every combination of keywords and masks and use flags so far in |
29 |
> > this thread on 2 different computers and I get errors that the packages |
30 |
> > can't be installed, and I keep running into the same bug as the top of |
31 |
> > this thread. Am I missing something? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Yes. Clearly, you are incapable of following our directions without a bit |
34 |
> more guidance or doing any independent research on the problem. I can |
35 |
> provide that guidance for the low price of 28.50 USD an hour, with a |
36 |
> minimum charge of 4 hours; you'll have gnucash installed at the end or no |
37 |
> charge at all. To get started, I'll need your payment information and the |
38 |
> contents of /etc/portage/package.* and /etc/make.conf and the output |
39 |
> of 'emerge --info', 'ls /etc/portage', 'ls -d /etc/make.profile'; I |
40 |
> believe the list would prefer you send this information with private |
41 |
> email. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> For a more expensive, but very reasonable 42.75 USD an hour, you can just |
44 |
> give me root access to your Gentoo box(es) and I'll fix them all. While |
45 |
> you do take a bit of a risk (I can do anything with root access, right?), |
46 |
> since my access is part of a business arragement my liability for damage I |
47 |
> cause, especially intentionally, just went up 10x (or more), at least in |
48 |
> my jurisdiction. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> > If this is a but, won't it be |
51 |
> > fixed in some new version of portage? |
52 |
> |
53 |
> There *a* bug covered at the top of the thread. It is (1) not a bug with |
54 |
> portage, but rather a single package and (2) not likely to get fix since |
55 |
> that version of the package depends on (broken) glib 1.x. |
56 |
> |
57 |
|
58 |
Thanks Boyd, for your generous offer! I will take a bit more time and |
59 |
read through the gentoo docs again. If I run out of time, I will take |
60 |
you up on that! |
61 |
|
62 |
Thanks again |
63 |
rick |
64 |
|
65 |
-- |
66 |
gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list |