1 |
On Saturday 15 August 2009 19:47:35 Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
3 |
> > - qt4-tng eclass |
4 |
> > Here i dunno what ever you plan guys, so enlighten me :P |
5 |
> |
6 |
> We have had qt4-edge.eclass in qting-edge overlay for quite some time |
7 |
> now. I think that most of the new functionality is ready to go to |
8 |
> portage. As we now define phases we did not before, it would break |
9 |
> qt.eclass. So we decided to go for a new eclass. We said we would still |
10 |
> brainstorm/bikeshed over the name for this eclass, but i haven't heard |
11 |
> anything better than qt4-tng so far. New ideas are welcome. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> As far as I understand the langs handling still needs work, or are we |
14 |
> ready to commit that as well? |
15 |
Works for most packages so I think it is safe to introduce it as a separate |
16 |
function. I would strongly suggest though not to call it inside src_install() |
17 |
function but use it separately instead |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Is there anything else needed, or any other comments, before we propose |
20 |
> the new eclass to -dev ML? |
21 |
Please review it first since there are some "pretty" hacks like : |
22 |
a) fallback to S="${WORKDIR}/{MY_P} when ${WORKDIR}/${P} doesnt exist |
23 |
b) DOCS installation on src_install and a special variable DOCSDIR which |
24 |
defines the path under which the docs are located on source dir |
25 |
c) some other hacks I don't remember :) |
26 |
|
27 |
Since I was the one who introduced those hacks, I am not really sure you 've |
28 |
noticed them o:) |
29 |
|
30 |
> |
31 |
> Cheers, |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Ben |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
37 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sound/Sunrise] |
38 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |