| 1 |
Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> - qt4-tng eclass |
| 4 |
> Here i dunno what ever you plan guys, so enlighten me :P |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
We have had qt4-edge.eclass in qting-edge overlay for quite some time |
| 7 |
now. I think that most of the new functionality is ready to go to |
| 8 |
portage. As we now define phases we did not before, it would break |
| 9 |
qt.eclass. So we decided to go for a new eclass. We said we would still |
| 10 |
brainstorm/bikeshed over the name for this eclass, but i haven't heard |
| 11 |
anything better than qt4-tng so far. New ideas are welcome. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
As far as I understand the langs handling still needs work, or are we |
| 14 |
ready to commit that as well? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Is there anything else needed, or any other comments, before we propose |
| 17 |
the new eclass to -dev ML? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Cheers, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ben |
Archives