|
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-desktop
Drake Wyrm wrote:
> I rather have to disagree. *.example files and other
> documentation-related goodies in my /etc directory annoy me, but a
> well-commented config file with some reasonable defaults is a dream to
> work with.
exactly
> A few interesting *.example files under /usr/share/doc would
> be spiffy.
Examples, in a non-annoying place, are always good.
> I know every once in a while you get complaints from a user who
> inattentively clobbered something vital. Just remember that the ones you
> notice are the screaming minority.
Being the user who "inattentively clobbered something vital", and then
started this thread, I can say:
1) I'm a newbie at gentoo and udev (as is everyone), but not a Linux
newbie. I've been hand editing my fstab on various distributions for
over ten years.
2) If I made this mistake, probably someone else has or will too.
So, perhaps it's useful to know why I made the mistake (by the way, I
did keep my old fstab around, so it was easy to put back, and the reason
I got confused was that the system worked fine with the borked fstab,
except for errors trying to run fschk on boot. It's still a mystery to
me how the system ran with that fstab!)
Anyway, the reason I got confused was that the fstab that came with the
udev package had "BOOT", "ROOT", and "SWAP" in it with NO explanation
that those were placeholders. They looked to me like they might be magic
names that udev figured out for you. The fact that my system worked
reinforced this idea. So:
if there were a single, simple comment it that file, I would not have
made the mistake. Something like:
# This is a template of an example fstab file. Replace "BOOT", "ROOT",
# and "SWAP" with the appropriate drive devices for you system, for
# example: "/dev/hda3" for the third partition of the first IDE drive.
Another thought: Is there a way for portage to tell the difference
between an install and an upgrade? and if an upgrade, what version is
being upgraded from? In an upgrade, there is no need install a new
config file unless the features or syntax of that config file has
changed. In this case, I can think of no reason that I would ever have
needed a new fstab after upgrading udev, and a BIG reason to keep the
old one. It would be nice of portage could figure this out for me and
not make me figure it out myself. Indeed, if there has been a change in
features or syntax, I'd love to know what those changes are, in some
easy to access place.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@...
--
gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list
|
| Replies: |
Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Chris Gianelloni
|
Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Paul de Vrieze
|
| References: |
udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Chris Barker
|
Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Augusto Cezar Amaral
|
Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Chris Barker
|
Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Tim Weber
|
Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Chris Gianelloni
|
Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot.
-- Drake Wyrm
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-desktop:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: KDE 3.3.2 |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot. |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: udev, fstab, and fsck at boot. |
| Next by date: |
| Re: Parts of applications menu goes missing |
|
|
Updated Jun 17, 2009 |
Summary:
Archive of the gentoo-desktop mailing list.
|
|
Donate to support our development efforts.
|
|
|