1 |
Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> If you'd like a bug open on it (note that I haven't looked to see if one's |
3 |
> open already, this is just intended as exploratory discussion), I can open |
4 |
> one. |
5 |
|
6 |
There have already been bugs opened about it (and closed), we're waiting |
7 |
for a patch from someone who cares because we have higher priority |
8 |
things to do. Most of the applications now have descriptions gotten from |
9 |
a script, but libraries, protocol headers, fonts, etc lack them. It is |
10 |
nontrivial to script the remaining poorly described packages because |
11 |
they lack man pages from which the descriptions could be pulled. |
12 |
|
13 |
Again, we will be happy for this to happen but we cannot commit the time |
14 |
necessary to do it. |
15 |
|
16 |
Thanks, |
17 |
Donnie |