1 |
Hello, |
2 |
|
3 |
just looked at it. |
4 |
|
5 |
1. The patch is currently not needed, since libpng>=1.4. But we can |
6 |
apply it anyway, since it's checked inside code using macro. |
7 |
2. No problem here (x86_64 issue?) |
8 |
3. Seen this error, not sure why. But since patches work fine again |
9 |
with eapi=1, there is probably no harm reverting. |
10 |
|
11 |
Just pushed update, 1 and 3 should work fine now. |
12 |
|
13 |
Regards Ladislav Laska |
14 |
S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
15 |
--- |
16 |
xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Chris Bandy <cbandy@××××××.com> wrote: |
21 |
> Ladislav Laska wrote: |
22 |
>> Hello, |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> just what I had in mind. Works just fine with everything I tested - good job. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> Regards Ladislav Laska |
27 |
>> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska |
28 |
>> --- |
29 |
>> xmpp/jabber: ladislav.laska@××××××.cz |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Martin von Gagern |
34 |
>> <Martin.vGagern@×××.net> wrote: |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>>> Hi there! |
37 |
>>> |
38 |
>>> On 19.02.2010 22:23, Ladislav Laska wrote: |
39 |
>>> |
40 |
>>>> Hello again, |
41 |
>>>> |
42 |
>>>> I have decided to continue discussion in new thread. This discussion |
43 |
>>>> was started in thread "kde-sunset: kdepim-kresources broken". |
44 |
>>>> |
45 |
>>>> I have replaced my code with what I originally intended (the code in |
46 |
>>>> git is wrong, since I made a mistake editing it - here is what I |
47 |
>>>> intended): |
48 |
>>>> |
49 |
>>>> # Check for PATCHES in EAPI=0|1 |
50 |
>>>> case ${EAPI:-0} in |
51 |
>>>> 0|1) |
52 |
>>>> if [[ -n ${PATCHES} ]] && [[ -d "${KDE_S}" ]]; then |
53 |
>>>> base_src_prepare |
54 |
>>>> fi |
55 |
>>>> ;; |
56 |
>>>> esac |
57 |
>>>> |
58 |
>>>> Look, for example, at kde-base/ark ebuild. There is a patch, but it's |
59 |
>>>> not applied correctly without my code. |
60 |
>>>> |
61 |
>>> media-gfx/gwenview-1.4.2-r3, on the other hand, would try applying |
62 |
>>> patches twice /with/ your code. |
63 |
>>> |
64 |
>>> |
65 |
>>>> What I'm worried about is the check [[ -d "${KDE_S}" ]] makes sure, |
66 |
>>>> that this code is called if |
67 |
>>>> |
68 |
>>>> [[ -d "${KDE_S}" ]] || base_src_unpack unpack |
69 |
>>>> |
70 |
>>>> did not called base-src_unpack and therefore did not applied patches. |
71 |
>>>> |
72 |
>>>> There are two problems with EAPI=0|1 |
73 |
>>>> |
74 |
>>>> 1) It depends on file naming and will not work if base_src_unpack |
75 |
>>>> unpacks into $KDE_S |
76 |
>>>> |
77 |
>>> You mean kde-meta_src_unpack does unpack into $KDE_S, right? |
78 |
>>> |
79 |
>>> I just had a look. For kde-base/ark, kde-meta_src_unpack does unpack |
80 |
>>> part of the tarball, therefore kde_src_unpack won't call |
81 |
>>> base_src_unpack, therefore base_src_prepare won't get called either. |
82 |
>>> |
83 |
>>> |
84 |
>>>> 2) Even if base_src_unpack calls base_src_prepare, we're adding |
85 |
>>>> patches automatically after this call, but they will not be applied. |
86 |
>>>> |
87 |
>>> You're right, there is code collecting additional patches from $PATCHDIR |
88 |
>>> into the $PATCHES array. So we need to call base_src_prepare /after/ |
89 |
>>> that, while the current base_src_unpack call comes before that, and |
90 |
>>> unpacking has to come before that as $PATCHDIR is unpacked as well. |
91 |
>>> |
92 |
>>> As base_src_unpack calls base_src_prepare unconditionally for recent |
93 |
>>> incarnations of base.eclass, I feel we cannot call base_src_unpack at |
94 |
>>> all. Instead we should simply call "unpack ${A}" directly, and |
95 |
>>> base_src_prepare later on. |
96 |
>>> |
97 |
>>> I feel that this code collecting and applying $PATCHES would be better |
98 |
>>> suited to a kde_src_prepare than kde_src_unpack, but I'm not sure it's |
99 |
>>> worth refactoring kde.eclass. |
100 |
>>> |
101 |
>>> |
102 |
>>>> Since I can't think of correct check, please let me know if you have |
103 |
>>>> an idea. Also, let me know if I'm wrong about something and it's not |
104 |
>>>> needed at all. (but I doubt that, because ark, as mentioned above, is |
105 |
>>>> counterexample) |
106 |
>>>> |
107 |
>>> No, you are correct in diagnosing the problem. I just had another stab |
108 |
>>> at a solution. Have a look at 5979aefafa6e200a09d5dd7b3a6e99b3e0a9d74e |
109 |
>>> and see if you find any package where that approach doesn't work. |
110 |
>>> |
111 |
>>> Greetings, |
112 |
>>> Martin |
113 |
>>> |
114 |
> |
115 |
> I also tested the specific packages in question, and here's what I found: |
116 |
> |
117 |
> kde-base/ark-3.5.10 |
118 |
> * inherit kde-meta |
119 |
> * EAPI=1 works |
120 |
> |
121 |
> kde-base/kdepim-kresources-3.5.10 |
122 |
> * inherit kde-meta eutils |
123 |
> * requires EAPI=1 (more details below) |
124 |
> |
125 |
> kde-base/kicker-3.5.10-r2 |
126 |
> * inherit kde-meta eutils |
127 |
> * EAPI=1 works |
128 |
> * EAPI=2 works |
129 |
> |
130 |
> media-gfx/gwenview-1.4.2-r3 |
131 |
> * inherit kde |
132 |
> * EAPI=1 works |
133 |
> * EAPI=2 works |
134 |
> |
135 |
> |
136 |
> As a more comprehensive test, I rebuilt everything I had in |
137 |
> kde-sunset[1]. Everything regarding PATCHES worked great! However, I |
138 |
> had to make three changes to individual ebuilds: |
139 |
> |
140 |
> 1. Had to remove x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.8-libpng14.patch because it was not |
141 |
> in the Manifest |
142 |
> 2. Had to modify app-text/poppler/poppler-0.12.3-r3.ebuild as described |
143 |
> here: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6170313.html#6170313 |
144 |
> 3. Had to revert kde-base/kdepim-kresources-3.5.10.ebuild back to EAPI=1 |
145 |
> |
146 |
> I've attached a log for the failed EAPI=2 build in #3. |
147 |
> |
148 |
> [1] eix --installed-from-overlay kde-sunset --pure-packages --format |
149 |
> '<=emptyinstalled>' | xargs emerge -1 |
150 |
> |
151 |
> |
152 |
> -- Chris |
153 |
> |