1 |
Michał Górny posted on Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:30:22 +0200 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> 2) separate init.d scripts |
4 |
> -------------------------- |
5 |
> |
6 |
> This one is even heavier but more clean. This way, we only keep |
7 |
> a minimal subset of DM-related code in common, and let every DM install |
8 |
> its own init.d script. This way, we keep them clean and flexible. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> On the other hand, that would introduce a lot of repeating code, |
11 |
> and user would need to explicitly add appropriate DM to the runlevel. |
12 |
|
13 |
Consider this a user vote for this one. |
14 |
|
15 |
Perhaps put the common code in some sort of dependency (the initscripts |
16 |
could source a common base), and let each ?DM install its own init-script |
17 |
front-end. |
18 |
|
19 |
That would allow users (like me) who don't use a ?DM (text login, custom |
20 |
scripts that do some setup and run startx) to kill the initscripts and |
21 |
associated infrastructure (in the common dependency), currently shipping |
22 |
with xorg-server, for them. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
26 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
27 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |