Gentoo Archives: gentoo-desktop

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-desktop@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop] What "just works" and what doesn't?
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 13:15:25
Message-Id: 20041009151520.685b8177.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-desktop] What "just works" and what doesn't? by Paul de Vrieze
1 begin quote
2 On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 11:25:30 +0200
3 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote:
4
5
6 Okay, I'm short of temper today, so I'll try to not come across as
7 wanting to tear you apart. *grins*
8
9
10 > Well, we now have ACL support. You can easilly do this with acl in a
11 > straightforward way. We might want to make a manual describing how to
12 > do it.
13
14 Oops. guess that we don't have it supported then. We have the ability
15 to support it, however, I'm of the mind that a procedure that -isn't-
16 documented as avaiable for end-users isn't supported. Thats why we have
17 documentation.
18
19
20 >
21 > > Currently I'm using chmod 1777 /media/music, and run a script to
22 > > regularly set the permissions below it as this:
23 > > chgrp -R audio
24 > > chmod g+rw (for files)
25 > > chmod g+rxw (for directories)
26 >
27 > Acl's can set default permissions so your script shouldn't be needed
28 > anymore
29 > (but you might want to run it once in a while to ensure that).
30
31 Yep, Thats good if they can, and thats a good step to supporting
32 something like this.
33
34 > > however, this isn't really "optimal", but it works, and allows all
35 > > users to actually share the music. The whole idea is that the
36 > > directory is common storage, the same goes for other media. Things
37 > > that are private go into ~ anyhow.
38 >
39 > ACL's are great.
40
41 *Cough*
42
43
44 > > the main argument for it is that I/we can export /media/music over
45 > > samba/nfs for other people, it separates user-data from "global
46 > > commune"
47 > > data (at least where I live its perfectly ok to share music like
48 > > this.
49 > > *waves to the RIAA* )
50 >
51 > And you know what? Samba supports ACL's too.
52 >
53
54 Have I ever even refuted ACL's? I didn't bring them up since they
55 aren't documented as a possibility. Neither are group rights, Merlin,
56 or any of the other rights based permission-sets avaiable for unix. I
57 didn't bring up clustered stores either, even if those can,
58 technically, be used.
59
60 Neither did I bring up things like R/W VFAT mounts, which would -also-
61 solve the problem of having a shared space for files... Simply by not
62 having rights management :-)
63
64
65 Frankly, my point wasn't about ACL, the point of wether ACL was great or
66 less good than the small rocks stuck in the soles of my boots, or for
67 that matter if we should simply discard all rights management or not.
68
69 The question I posed, along with a somewhat make-shift solution, was
70 that we ought to have such a thing documented as avaiable. (yes, that
71 means supported ;)
72
73
74 I've seen solutions based on WebDAV + mdns to discover it, by indexing
75 the local Music dir in users homedirs shared with apache to the other
76 users (rendezvous / zeroconf style) But, this again, isn't something
77 we support, nor would I really advocate it, as it isn't optimal in any
78 sense.
79
80
81 Sharp rant out.
82
83 //Spider
84
85
86
87 --
88 begin .signature
89 Tortured users / Laughing in pain
90 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
91 end

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-desktop] What "just works" and what doesn't? Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>