1 |
Wednesday, 13. June 2007, Alexandre Bique Ви написали: |
2 |
> What do you think of adding a dev-d category to portage ? |
3 |
> If you don't know the D programing language, you should take |
4 |
> a look at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/ it's very exciting ;-) |
5 |
Well, I do know about D, but what I would like to know about is how many |
6 |
D-related packages are we talking about here? Is there some list somwhere, |
7 |
best of all in a bug? That really is the basis for the decision. Last time |
8 |
when I looked for D reated submissions (triggered by that gdc bug) I only |
9 |
could see two and even then those were for the compilers themselves (gdc and |
10 |
dmd) and these will go under dev-lang. Another category only makes sense if |
11 |
there are enough D libs or other D-specific packages ready for inclusion or |
12 |
already scattered around the tree. |
13 |
|
14 |
Actually, on second read I feel a bit confused. Are you talking about |
15 |
including the D compiler itself by chance? In that case you are too late - it |
16 |
is already in ;). Check the use flags of later gcc versions and try to look |
17 |
for dmd as well. That last one might not be in yet (not sure completely, D |
18 |
was finally taken over by somebody, so I stopped paying much attention) but n |
19 |
any case you might find the ebuild in bugzilla, just search for dmd. |
20 |
|
21 |
George |
22 |
|
23 |
PS |
24 |
We also have this mailing list?? Amaizing, I did not realize that :). Even |
25 |
though I don't remember signing up for it, but that may be because I am on |
26 |
lang-misc herd. In any case, I suspect there are not that many peple on this |
27 |
list, so, in general, you might get better luck on gentoo-dev. It gets too |
28 |
little attention lately (what I mean is, it severely lacks development |
29 |
contents, may be this is the reason there are so many falmes on it :)). |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev-lang@g.o mailing list |