Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
<< First < Prev [ Lists: gentoo-dev: By Thread | By Date ] Next > Last >>
Tue Sep 21, 2004
CIA-2 and "gentoo" CVS module- Chris Gianelloni
Re: emerge -U getting removed?- Doug Goldstein
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Ned Ludd
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Chris Gianelloni
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Ned Ludd
Re: s390 repoman- Mike Frysinger
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Ned Ludd
Re: Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain- Ferris McCormick
s390 repoman- Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain- Ned Ludd
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Rumen Yotov
Re: Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Helmar Wieland
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Chris Gianelloni
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Paul de Vrieze
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Chris Gianelloni
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Luke-Jr
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Paul de Vrieze
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Joshua Brindle
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Chris Gianelloni
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Chris Gianelloni
Re: Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Carsten Lohrke
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Duncan
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Duncan
Re: doc_about_ebuild_functions- Aaron Walker
Re: Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Paul de Vrieze
Re: doc_about_ebuild_functions- Christian Parpart
Re: doc_about_ebuild_functions- Marius Mauch
doc_about_ebuild_functions- Tamas Sarga
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Joel Konkle-Parker
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Joel Konkle-Parker
Re: emerge -U getting removed?- Mike Frysinger
Re: s390 status- Mike Frysinger
Re: s390 status- Michael Imhof
Re: Segregating KDE?- Simone Gotti
Mon Sep 20, 2004
Re: s390 status- Joshua Brindle
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- foser
Re: s390 status- Michael Imhof
Official support for s390 to be dropped- Brian Jackson
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Malte S. Stretz
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- John Davis
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Malte S. Stretz
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Carsten Lohrke
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Paul de Vrieze
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Paul de Vrieze
Re: USE="acl" in profiles- Ioannis Aslanidis
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Carsten Lohrke
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Carsten Lohrke
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Malte S. Stretz
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
USE="acl" in profiles- Benjamin Judas
Re: emerge -U getting removed?- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Malte S. Stretz
Re: emerge -U getting removed?- Luke-Jr
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Carsten Lohrke
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Armando Di Cianno
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Sami Samhuri
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
2004.3-prerelease stages- Benjamin Judas
Re: emerge -U getting removed?- Ciaran McCreesh
emerge -U getting removed?- Jeffrey Forman
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Malte S. Stretz
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Paul de Vrieze
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Paul de Vrieze
Danish linuxmagazine on the look for good articles- Sven Vermeulen
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Paul de Vrieze
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Simon Watson
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Joshua J. Berry
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Luke-Jr
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Mike Frysinger
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
Re: Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Luke-Jr
Re: Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Ciaran McCreesh
aging ebuilds with unstable keywords- Daniel Ahlberg
Re: Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Luke-Jr
Sun Sep 19, 2004
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Armando Di Cianno
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Thomas Weidner
Re: s390 status- Greg KH
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Joshua J. Berry
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Joshua J. Berry
Re: Considering dropping the hardened toolchain (A Quantitive Approach)- Lars Weiler
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Luke-Jr
Re: s390 status- Mike Frysinger
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Malte S. Stretz
Re: s390 status- Ned Ludd
Re: Segregating KDE?- Simone Gotti
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Joshua J. Berry
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Mike Frysinger
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Paul de Vrieze
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Joshua J. Berry
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Dan Armak
Re: Segregating KDE?- Dan Armak
Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Ciaran McCreesh
any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?- Thomas Weidner
Re: Re: Segregating KDE?- Paul de Vrieze
Navigation:
<< First < Prev [ Lists: gentoo-dev: By Thread | By Date ] Next > Last >>


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.