Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
<< First < Prev [ Lists: gentoo-dev: By Thread | By Date ] Next > Last >>
Sat Jun 02, 2012
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- James Cloos
Fri Jun 01, 2012
Re: multiprocessing.eclass: doing parallel work in bash- Mike Frysinger
multiprocessing.eclass: doing parallel work in bash- Mike Frysinger
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michael Weber
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- William Hubbs
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- W. Trevor King
Re: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- William Hubbs
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michał Górny
Re: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Andreas K. Huettel
Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Andreas K. Huettel
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Andreas K. Huettel
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Package up for grabs: app-misc/gcal- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Nicolas Sebrecht
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michał Górny
m68k status- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
lastrite x11-terms/cxterm- Samuli Suominen
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michał Górny
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michał Górny
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Thu May 31, 2012
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Peter Stuge
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- William Hubbs
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- William Hubbs
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- William Hubbs
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michael Orlitzky
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michał Górny
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- William Hubbs
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Alexey Shvetsov
last rites: games-util/nforenum- Michael Sterrett
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Michał Górny
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- William Hubbs
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?- Sébastien Fabbro
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Robin H. Johnson
[PATCH eutils] Introduce prune_libtool_files().- Michał Górny
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Peter Stuge
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Aaron W. Swenson
Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use.- Michał Górny
Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use.- Mike Frysinger
Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use.- Michał Górny
Wed May 30, 2012
Re: Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?- Mike Frysinger
Re: Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?- Michael Orlitzky
Re: dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch)- Mike Frysinger
Re: Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?- Mike Frysinger
Re: dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch)- Mike Frysinger
Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use.- Mike Frysinger
Re: Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: RFC: Virtual for awk implementation- Florian Philipp
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Justin
Re: Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?- Ian Stakenvicius
Re: Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use.- Michał Górny
Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?- Michał Górny
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Aaron W. Swenson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Tobias Klausmann
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Duncan
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver- Rich Freeman
Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?- Hilco Wijbenga
Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?- Zac Medico
RFC: Virtual for awk implementation- Christoph Junghans
Tue May 29, 2012
Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?- Richard Yao
Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?- Zac Medico
Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?- Zac Medico
Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?- Hilco Wijbenga
Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?- Zac Medico
Navigation:
<< First < Prev [ Lists: gentoo-dev: By Thread | By Date ] Next > Last >>


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.