| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2009.06.07 16:54, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
| 5 |
> Seriously, let's stop. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> This endless debate has gone on for waaay too long and it is just |
| 8 |
> plain |
| 9 |
> spam now. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
[snip] |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Let's just all agree we've failed to reach a consensus and let's |
| 14 |
> spend time on something else. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
[snip] |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Cheers, |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Rémi |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Rémi, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I think that GLEP55 has failed so far because it has always been |
| 27 |
inadequately documented in the GLEP. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
My view is that its worth documenting the problem and potential |
| 30 |
solutions properly and having one more go. Thats why I'm putting my |
| 31 |
time into editing the GLEP now. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
The problem won't be addressed by spending time on something else. |
| 34 |
The one big problem needs to be broken down recursively into smaller |
| 35 |
problems that can be addressed individually, rather like a very old |
| 36 |
asteriods game. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
If we get a solution, Gentoo can be first into the future again, if |
| 39 |
not, we will always be last out of the past. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Gentoo needs a way to introduce new features without waiting over a |
| 42 |
year to provide backwards compatibility. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
- -- |
| 45 |
Regards, |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Roy Bamford |
| 48 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
| 49 |
gentoo-ops |
| 50 |
forum-mods |
| 51 |
treecleaners |
| 52 |
trustees |
| 53 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 54 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkor6AAACgkQTE4/y7nJvavJUACgwgVZHuD1ylcq45DgvGi9SBAd |
| 57 |
RGEAoJ5XBmNWNb6H1UHk5aQYC18TeY5g |
| 58 |
=rbTU |
| 59 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives