Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:34:23
Message-Id: 20088.38450.587143.52345@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem by Ciaran McCreesh
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Paludis wise, it's eapi2 indirictely due to boost and eselect.
> The eselect dependency is hard, and can't easily be made optional, > so ideally eselect should stick with older EAPIs.
Eselect's maintainer is well aware of this. I intend to keep 1.2.15 (which is EAPI 0) around for some time. Ulrich