| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 26/10/11 02:50 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> All, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> openrc has two network stacks currently. The first is the one most |
| 8 |
> people are using afaik, the net.* scripts, which I will call oldnet in |
| 9 |
> the rest of this message. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The second is the network and staticroute scripts, which we do not use |
| 12 |
> or support in gentoo, primarily because it does not allow the |
| 13 |
> flexability of the oldnet scripts. I will call these scripts newnet. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> If there are no objections, I want to remove the newnet scripts before |
| 16 |
> the next release. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> What does everyone think? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> William |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It's been a while since I hung out in #gentoo, but one of the last times |
| 24 |
I was there (say, July?), there were people supporting the use of the |
| 25 |
newnet method (and i *think* were actually trying to get people to switch). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Personally, I prefer oldnet and would support the removal of newnet. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Ian |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk6oV7EACgkQAJxUfCtlWe1QpAEAqK8u6Lbz4XAOoPTmibdbgwmy |
| 34 |
7aJj5O5wBjb4ASVfDbEA/iQgNkd1seB9IeBTz8d+/xEclg4ZDHgVv+wX4AnZIJs/ |
| 35 |
=PZL7 |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives