| 1 |
2008/6/8 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> 1. GLEP54 |
| 5 |
>> 2. GLEP55 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> None of them got discussion back in -dev, the glep hadn't been changed as |
| 8 |
> requested during the unnecessary long discussion in the meeting. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Looks like the overall consensus is that those aren't useful as they are and |
| 11 |
> thus either you fix them, discussing the changes with the people in -dev |
| 12 |
> (NOT THE COUNCIL) or you may retract them. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
They don't need any more discussion, but people sitting back and |
| 15 |
thinking them through. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>> 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Somebody is thinking the PMS and the EAPI definition as it is are wrong and |
| 20 |
> should be replaced since they aren't useful for their purpose. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Somebody? Replaced with what? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Best Regards, |
| 26 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
Archives