1 |
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Talk to a lawyer if you disagree with this. The area of copyright law, |
4 |
> and software, is very well defined (with one exception of the "major |
5 |
> change to add your copyright, and even then, there's an agreed apon |
6 |
> standard to follow). Because of that, I disagree that you think this is |
7 |
> something that is unknown at all. |
8 |
|
9 |
I realize that it is illegal to remove a copyright line from a work |
10 |
without permission, just as it is illegal to copy a work in the first |
11 |
place without permission. The question is whether the GPL gives such |
12 |
permission, whether it is possible to give such permission, or at |
13 |
least whether you can give somebody this permission and then sue them |
14 |
for following through. |
15 |
|
16 |
That's my main concern here. Can somebody say, "sure, go ahead and |
17 |
remove my name from the copyright line" and then sue you for doing it? |
18 |
|
19 |
> |
20 |
> But I'm not going to be able to change your mind :) Please get the |
21 |
> Foundation to write up the rules apon which Gentoo developers need to |
22 |
> handle the copyright mark, so that there's no disagreement as to what to |
23 |
> do, in any type of situation. |
24 |
|
25 |
I'm not curious enough that I'd be willing to spend money on this. If |
26 |
somebody wants to change my mind they're welcome to provide me with a |
27 |
reference for a relevant case. I'm sure there are endless cases of |
28 |
bad things happening to people removing copyright lines, just as there |
29 |
are endless cases of people being sued for copying files. I'm |
30 |
concerned with cases where something bad has happened to somebody who |
31 |
removed a copyright line after being given permission to do so, and |
32 |
cases dealing with copyleft licenses and whether they grant this |
33 |
permission. |
34 |
|
35 |
I suspect the wisest course of action for the Foundation will be to |
36 |
take the conservative approach. However, I do not believe that this |
37 |
is because this is legally required. It is simply a matter of not |
38 |
being wise to spend all that donated money fighting to prove that this |
39 |
is the case. After all, even if I'm completely right, that doesn't |
40 |
mean that somebody can't sue me. Winning a legal case in the US is a |
41 |
very expensive proposition. I'm sure that would be the advice of any |
42 |
lawyer we retained. All that said, a formal policy would be a good |
43 |
idea. |
44 |
|
45 |
Rich |