| 1 |
On Tue, 10 May 2005 21:54:33 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Is there a standard way of handling testing for utility-type eclasses? |
| 4 |
| For versionator I currently have a __versionator__test_blah function |
| 5 |
| included in the eclass (source versionator.eclass works, it doesn't |
| 6 |
| have any portage-specific code), but this is going to get a bit messy |
| 7 |
| when I add in another few dozen tests... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
And along the same lines... Please test the updated versionator.eclass |
| 10 |
that I have posted to [1]. I'd really rather find any bugs *before* it |
| 11 |
hits the tree :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
[1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 17 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 18 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives