1 |
On 12th November I plan to request the x86 and amd64 arch teams to mark |
2 |
2.6.23 stable. |
3 |
|
4 |
Right now we have one reported kernel regression: |
5 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197264 |
6 |
but I expect this to be fixed in advance. If more come up, they will |
7 |
potentially delay the above stabling, but hopefully we'll fix them all |
8 |
quick enough that we can stick to the above date. |
9 |
|
10 |
Regressions related to packages unrelated to the kernel itself are |
11 |
tracked here: |
12 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195298 |
13 |
I'll be going through these soon and helping out where I can, but |
14 |
ultimately it's up to the maintainers to actually fix these in the |
15 |
stable tree, and open bugs there are unlikely to hold up any kernel |
16 |
stabling. |
17 |
|
18 |
Daniel |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |