1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 04:13 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
5 |
> It's not one or the other: it's both. Nobody needs to "win" the |
6 |
> maintainership battle here. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Here's how I see it. PMs are responsible for the whole package, including |
9 |
> arch-independent and arch-dependent aspects. Independently, PMs work to |
10 |
> ensure the arch-independent parts are stable. Together with AMs, the PMs |
11 |
> work to ensure the arch-dependent aspects are stable. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Until the day when AMs have equal amounts of time to spend on each package |
14 |
> as PMs, I don't see this changing. |
15 |
|
16 |
Perhaps "win" is too strong of a word. "Precedence" is more what I mean. But |
17 |
I can certainly see your point. |
18 |
|
19 |
- -- |
20 |
Jason Huebel |
21 |
Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead |
22 |
Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter |
23 |
|
24 |
GPG Public Key: |
25 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230 |
26 |
|
27 |
"Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand." |
28 |
Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677) |
29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
30 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
31 |
|
32 |
iD8DBQFA2feybNgbbJup4jARAs81AJ9TYrA4VoF+tOmvLDsIoRu/najPoACeKx00 |
33 |
1LTbpbtZR8tCdXhqnmHUgog= |
34 |
=Iosx |
35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |