Archives
Archives
| From: | Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] How default route should be set by pppd |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:05:44 |
| Message-Id: | 451EB06D.4080208@gentoo.org |
| 1 | Hi fellow devs, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I discovered that ppp-2.4.4 set a default route without a gateway. It is |
| 4 | totally fine from IP routing point of view (the simple fact that route |
| 5 | is through the point-to-point link is enough to know the next hop), |
| 6 | except that openswan's %defaultroute need a default gateway in order to |
| 7 | work. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I'm about to apply a patch that would reverse to the old way of setting |
| 10 | the default route. |
| 11 | Any objections? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How default route should be set by pppd | Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: How default route should be set by pppd | "Sven Köhler" <skoehler@×××.de> |