| 1 |
On 07/25/2018 02:28 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Adding udev to the base profile will make customization much harder |
| 4 |
> for people unwilling to use udev. This is the problem. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
To stay on the original track, I was suggesting adding it to the linux |
| 8 |
profile component, not base. And people who are unwilling to use udev |
| 9 |
would disable it globally, like people who are unwilling to use pam or ipv6. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But I understand where you're coming from in general-- that we've |
| 12 |
already achieved a good minimal balance in enabling udev only where it's |
| 13 |
really needed, and enabling it in linux make.defaults will make it |
| 14 |
difficult to get back to that state. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So I will just continue to ask for IUSE=+udev where I believe it's very |
| 17 |
important for sane functionality of a particular package. In other |
| 18 |
words, I'm no longer pushing for the make.defaults change. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-Ben |
Archives