Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter <sw98234@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:32
Message-Id: ef0t23$aqj$8@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers by Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:13:23 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:

> I just want to prefix this by saying that I was simply going to ignore > your posts in this thread completely due to your obviously inflammatory > nature at the beginning. Now that you're posting actual constructive > criticisms, I'd like to respond. By the way, thank you for changing > your tone to something more productive. >
Bunk! Unnecessary to write. Why not just plonk me and be done with it. Nothing I wrote was inflammatory at all. My criticism of the recruitment process stand. Your response was welcome. The prefix was condescending and offensive. You, as leaders, have to really think through what your intentions are and how you are going to deal with people and factions with various objectives. Telling people they are obviously inflammatory is really not a strong way to begin. -- Peter -- gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o>