| 1 |
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:56:58 -0400 |
| 2 |
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug |
| 5 |
> assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo |
| 6 |
> Policy. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or |
| 9 |
> stabilize a particular package should initially be assigned to the |
| 10 |
> herd/maintainer of said package with all requested arches being CCed. |
| 11 |
> Once all but the last arch has keyworded said package, it is |
| 12 |
> acceptable and proper for a bug wrangler and/or maintainer/herd to |
| 13 |
> re-assign the bug to the last remaining arch and they remove that |
| 14 |
> arch from CC. They should add their herd/maintainer to the CC of the |
| 15 |
> bug. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Once the last remaining arch has completed the bug, it is up to them |
| 18 |
> to close it. They know it's up to them to close it since the bug is |
| 19 |
> assigned directly to them. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> This helps keep bugzilla tidy and makes it easy to identify |
| 22 |
> stabilization/keywording requests which are a priority for that arch |
| 23 |
> to take care of. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I couldn't agree with you more, it's only and correct way to handle |
| 26 |
these bugs. I have recently gone thru some bugs and did just that. |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives