1 |
On 05/04/2016 02:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
>>>>>> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Austin English wrote: |
3 |
>> I've been working on the transition from #!/sbin/runscript to |
4 |
>> #!/sbin/openrc-run [1], by starting on the maintainer-needed |
5 |
>> packages. That's done (aside from some stabilizations needed, but |
6 |
>> I'll deal with that latter). The trouble is that there are roughly |
7 |
>> 700 packages that need to be updated, and that's an insane number of |
8 |
>> bugs to file. |
9 |
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573846 |
10 |
> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage |
11 |
> tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch any init |
12 |
> scripts installed from elsewhere. You should look for the set of |
13 |
> installed files instead. |
14 |
How is that relevant here at all? I'm cleaning up portage installed init |
15 |
scripts, what a user does outside of that is a separate problem (for the |
16 |
init program, not gentoo.git). |
17 |
|
18 |
> Also, what problem are you trying to solve? My guess would be that |
19 |
> /sbin/runscript must be kept around indefinitely in any case, in order |
20 |
> not to risk breakage on users' systems. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Ulrich |
23 |
Again, not my issue. I'm trying to prevent the problem from spreading |
24 |
further. If only new scripts get openrc-run, the runscript shebang |
25 |
should be rare in a year now, for example. But again, that's for OpenRC |
26 |
to decide. That's not reason not to get away from the deprecated name now. |