Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Austin English <wizardedit@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 07:51:09
Message-Id: 5729A9DD.8010305@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run by Ulrich Mueller
1 On 05/04/2016 02:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2 >>>>>> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Austin English wrote:
3 >> I've been working on the transition from #!/sbin/runscript to
4 >> #!/sbin/openrc-run [1], by starting on the maintainer-needed
5 >> packages. That's done (aside from some stabilizations needed, but
6 >> I'll deal with that latter). The trouble is that there are roughly
7 >> 700 packages that need to be updated, and that's an insane number of
8 >> bugs to file.
9 >> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573846
10 > Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage
11 > tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch any init
12 > scripts installed from elsewhere. You should look for the set of
13 > installed files instead.
14 How is that relevant here at all? I'm cleaning up portage installed init
15 scripts, what a user does outside of that is a separate problem (for the
16 init program, not gentoo.git).
17
18 > Also, what problem are you trying to solve? My guess would be that
19 > /sbin/runscript must be kept around indefinitely in any case, in order
20 > not to risk breakage on users' systems.
21 >
22 > Ulrich
23 Again, not my issue. I'm trying to prevent the problem from spreading
24 further. If only new scripts get openrc-run, the runscript shebang
25 should be rare in a year now, for example. But again, that's for OpenRC
26 to decide. That's not reason not to get away from the deprecated name now.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies