1 |
On 10/04/2017 19:58, Christopher Head wrote: |
2 |
> On April 9, 2017 7:04:13 PM PDT, "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> The present system is a PITA for users. Fiddling with adding/removing |
4 |
>> targets for Python/Ruby. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> As an ordinary user, that does sound like a real annoyance. As an ordinary user, I also never do it. I don’t have any targets set by hand. I probably never will. And yes, I do some Python development myself (not much packaging but “using” Python in the sense of writing Python code). I find the Python experience largely painless: I currently have 2.7.12 and 3.4.5 installed. Eventually 3.5 will get installed and 3.4 will go away. Just like every other package. I won’t need to do any config file editing, just a revdep-rebuild run perhaps. So regardless of the situation for maintainers, as a user, I don’t see this pain. |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
As another regular user, you most definitely will see this pain if you |
11 |
need to deviate from your profile defaults for python. |
12 |
|
13 |
I'm like you - use lots of python, package some, write some. I also |
14 |
don't go past the current ~arch python-3 because I have a good sense of |
15 |
what waits for me if I do. |
16 |
|
17 |
That you and I don't suffer too much breakage at all since years now is |
18 |
a testament that *someone* is touching all those ebuilds when they need |
19 |
to be touched, that they are managing to do it without much visible |
20 |
fallout is a minor engineering miracle or sheer hard work. |
21 |
|
22 |
I think William has a point; sometimes making a criteria a negative one |
23 |
result in a lot less work. A good survey usually gives numbers that let |
24 |
you tell if it will. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Alan McKinnon |
28 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |