| 1 |
On Wednesday 28 July 2004 7:58 pm, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: |
| 2 |
> Multiple votes per bug allows people to say "this bug is really |
| 3 |
> important to me." They have a limited number available; it's their |
| 4 |
> choice whether they want to spend them all on a single bug, or spread |
| 5 |
> them out to many. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The Mozilla project uses voting as well, but they allocate 10 votes |
| 8 |
> each, to spend however you please. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I thought Mozilla does it 1-per-bug, but I guess I'm mistaken. KDE works |
| 11 |
well with 20-per-bug. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm cool with it either way. Any reasonable value will probably work. I |
| 14 |
gave that example to show how I would set it up-- starting at one vote per |
| 15 |
bug and changing it later if users request it. I prefer incremental |
| 16 |
approaches (starting small and working up as the needs dictate). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
sj7trunks is responsible for maintaining bugzilla... so I believe he'd |
| 19 |
also be setting that value, if voting gets implemented; and I hope it |
| 20 |
does. Voting is a low cost, low impact tweak to give the users a way to |
| 21 |
help steer the things we're working on. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Cheers, |
| 24 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
| 25 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives