1 |
On 07/12/2010 03:50 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/12/2010 12:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
>> On 07/12/2010 07:53 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 07/11/2010 02:50 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote: |
5 |
>>>> -LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1" |
6 |
>>>> +LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 ${LDFLAGS}" |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> My existing, custom, entry for LDFLAGS breaks with this change. Not |
9 |
>>> nice. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> %% grep LDFLAGS /etc/make.conf |
12 |
>>> LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS},--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed" |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> -Jeremy |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> that only worked before because of a fluke (= profiles had only one |
17 |
>> LDFLAGS before). |
18 |
>> it's not valid to assume -Wl gets passed from previous instance and |
19 |
>> leave next ones dangling. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Ok, I thought it was alittle "funny" to change a variable's behavior |
23 |
> from non-stacking to stacking. If no one else has a problem with it, I |
24 |
> will just change my make.conf and get over it. No worries. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> -Jeremy |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
in fact, on related issue... |
30 |
|
31 |
the whitespace generated by that approach had a negative impact on |
32 |
dev-util/boost-build which is error prone to them |
33 |
|
34 |
so it got changed, your flags should work again (although they are too |
35 |
clever :-) |
36 |
|
37 |
- Samuli |