| 1 |
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 2 |
> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 3 |
> > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 4 |
> > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like herds |
| 5 |
> > > are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop |
| 6 |
> > > that herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > What do you think? |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: |
| 16 |
- Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and |
| 17 |
reflect reality) |
| 18 |
- Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages to |
| 21 |
maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
What do you prefer? |
Archives