| 1 |
Is there a good reason for handling package.mask differently from the |
| 2 |
various profiles in /usr/portage/profiles? IOW, would it be a problem |
| 3 |
to have portage look at /etc/package.mask (for example), which would |
| 4 |
be a symlink to one of several choices in /usr/portage/profiles? This |
| 5 |
would seem to facilitate separate package masks for different |
| 6 |
architectures, and would allow machines of different architectures to |
| 7 |
more easily share a locally mirrored portage tree. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-- |
| 10 |
Robert Coie <rac@××××××××××.jp> |
| 11 |
Implementor, Apropos Ltd. |
Archives