| 1 |
В Сбт, 30/04/2011 в 12:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen пишет: |
| 2 |
> On 04/30/2011 11:46 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I propose a simple new text: "Every commit should have an entry in |
| 4 |
> > ChangeLog." |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Nonfunctional commits should not be recored in ChangeLog. Personally I |
| 7 |
quite frequently add URLs of upstream bug reports in ChangeLog. I don't |
| 8 |
think this addition should be recorded in ChangeLog. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> > If we eventually autogenerate them from git logs this would |
| 11 |
> > happen any way (unless some kind of filtering system is in the middle) |
| 12 |
> > so we could already start now. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Without filtering system ChangeLogs are useless. Also I need some way to |
| 15 |
edit ChangeLogs manually. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> "Every new file, and modification to existing file should have an entry |
| 18 |
> in ChangeLog." to skip the proper ChangeLog-less removals. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Removal is quite functional change so it should be recored. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Peter. |
Archives