Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour.
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:10:06
Message-Id: 200707251707.10898.peper@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour. by Doug Goldstein
1 On Wednesday 25 of July 2007 16:18:06 Doug Goldstein wrote:
2 > I've read the bugs you've referenced and it just sounds like a bug in
3 > the Paludis ebuilds not having the proper depends.
4 >
5 > This e-mail was just some fear mongering on behalf of Paludis devs.
6
7 I think you misread my e-mail completly and btw. Paludis is following the same
8 rules:
9 A: PDEPEND="B"
10 B: RDEPEND="A"
11
12 Both portage and paludis can end up installing B before A and it seems there
13 is nothing wrong with it other than that I think it doesn't match the docs.
14
15 --
16 Best Regards,
17 Piotr Jaroszyński
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list