Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Armando Di Cianno <fafhrd@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEPEND mismatches
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:03:20
Message-Id: ffaa93216343ae8af57b50e1d5584734@asuka
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] *DEPEND mismatches by Sven Wegener
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 2005-07-05 20:00:24 -0400 Sven Wegener <swegener@g.o> wrote:
5
6 > Short explanation for the subject: A *DEPEND mismatch is when a
7 > package
8 > is listed in DEPEND, but missing in RDEPEND and vice versa. I have a
9 > list of ebuilds at
10 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~swegener/qa/depend-mismatches
11 > that contain such mismatches. I've already whitelisted packages like
12 > automake and autoconf, that are safe to be only in DEPEND. And I also
13 > whitelisted packages like emul-linux-x86-baselibs for being
14 > RDEPEND-only. Pure meta packages like gnome-base/gnome or kde-base/kde
15 > have everything whitelisted for RDEPEND and everything blacklisted for
16 > DEPEND. Additional blacklistings include virtual/modutils for DEPEND.
17
18 gnustep-apps/zipper is a frontend to:
19 app-arch/tar, app-arch/unzip, app-arch/lha, app-arch/unlzx
20 ... so it's safe for RDEPEND only.
21
22 __armando di cianno
23 fafhrd -at- gentoo org
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
26 Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail
27
28 iD8DBQFCy/EzwgiTPLI9xhcRAjjfAJ94tWBnFmRWq9wt/D3LtcVkS5IgkQCfSe5w
29 z8YMNyI7WeszYK6QYmL+Fis=
30 =Z6rY
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list