1 |
On 05/28/2010 12:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
4 |
>>> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the |
5 |
>>> problem by renaming it. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the |
10 |
>> (unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the |
11 |
>> $summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Then what is the bug for problems caused by the libpng-1.4 update? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Cheers, |
18 |
> Ben |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
If you have real bugs to report, open one per one package and make it |
22 |
block the tracker 305095. At the moment, there's none. |
23 |
|
24 |
If you want to discuss about local upgrading problems, then use the |
25 |
forums. The ebuild already comes with the workaround script for the |
26 |
broken .la files, and revdep-rebuild is in the gentoolkit package. |