Archives
Archives
| From: | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) | ||
| Date: | Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:49:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20121119164755.GB19832@waltdnes.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) by Greg KH |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:11:13PM -0800, Greg KH wrote |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > And note, Kay and Lennart are _not_ treating udev as a second-class |
| 4 | > citizen. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I said *STAND-ALONE* udev. Please re-read the two posts... |
| 7 | http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html |
| 8 | http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-July/006065.html |
| 9 | |
| 10 | > It's required for systemd to work properly, and other distros (like |
| 11 | > Ubuntu), use it for their systems to work properly in a stand-alone |
| 12 | > manner. So breaking that will not happen, lots of people will ensure |
| 13 | > that that does not happen, myself included. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Kay and company have been rather cavalier in breaking systems in the |
| 16 | past. Richard Yao is working on an insurance policy, just in case Kay |
| 17 | and company do it again. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 21 | We are apparently better off trying to avoid udev like the plague. |
| 22 | Linus Torvalds; 2012/10/03 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/349 |