Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 04:59:48
Message-Id: pan.2012.05.14.04.58.29@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?) by Ulrich Mueller
Ulrich Mueller posted on Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200 as excerpted:

> On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote: > >> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use >> variable for users who need to pass something specific to make. > > You are right, of course.
> I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then: > > eclass/bsdmk.eclass > eclass/python.eclass > eclass/scons-utils.eclass > dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild > gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild > net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild > sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild > sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild
Ouch, in eclasses too! Yes. If I came across that I'd have filed bugs immediately, as I actually use EXTRA_* occasionally as a user, myself! Of course there's also the other PM users who would find these bugs. Is someone else filing bugs, or should I? Probably a tracker, along with individual bugs (only one for redis, tho)? What about a repoman check? Bug for that too? (If the answer is me do it, please bump me in say 10 days or so if I don't. I'm having stability problems on my main machine right now. ATA resets and I've already switched sata card and hard drive. Probably time for a new mobo/cpus/etc, but no $$ for it. =:^( I may end up netbook- only, severely restricting gentoo upgrades for awhile!) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies