| 1 |
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:58 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > All, |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from |
| 9 |
> > > go-module.eclass. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa |
| 12 |
> > > warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they |
| 15 |
> > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > > Thoughts? |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > It seems like you're being very lazy about this. At a minimum, you |
| 20 |
> > should do the following: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I will respond to your points below, but first, I take offense to your |
| 23 |
> accusation of me being lazy especially since it seems pretty obvious you |
| 24 |
> didn't attempt to research my work before you said it. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
The phrasing of your original email, combined with a question you |
| 27 |
asked in IRC lead me to the wrong conclusion. Sorry about that. |
Archives