| 1 |
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 |
| 2 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to |
| 5 |
> CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? |
| 6 |
> 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an |
| 7 |
> example there |
| 8 |
> 17:37 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: Ok so doable then. Thanks. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without |
| 11 |
> mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff |
| 12 |
> in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent |
| 13 |
> stuff too. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
no thanks; we already have the policy to require that major changes to |
| 16 |
broad impact eclasses have gone through -dev, no need to add more |
| 17 |
bureaucracy. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Also, what will be the value of my opinion on changes on |
| 20 |
toolchain.eclass since I know nothing about it? |
| 21 |
Finally, find me someone able to review texlive-*.eclass changes. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Alexis. |
Archives